Section IV: Logical Reasoning (The Tactical Ambush) This section reconciles the data with the human intent of a professional operation. The Mission Assurance Logic: Human intuition and professional tactical logic agree: no one goes after a U.S. President alone with a bolt-action rifle. It is a "death sentence." A professional operation would require redundancy (a second marksman) to ensure the hit. Simultaneous Fire: The 0.6-second gap is best explained as synchronized fire from two marksmen (Depository and Dal-Tex) pulling their triggers at nearly the same time. The "Guilty Knowledge" Conclusion: The presence of a seasoned criminal like Brading in the secondary trajectory building is not a coincidence. While the legal system requires a "smoking gun," human logic recognizes a pattern of misprision and concealment. The marksmen likely had "handlers" like Brading to facilitate their escape while the police focused on the "patsy" (Oswald).
Part 4 of 4 Part 3: https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/1307659642
