CURRENT VOTE: Promotion of @cosmonaut218 to the position of manager. In the comment section of this project there may also be found the manager endorsements from before the vote began. These have been counted as votes in favour, but they must be ratified by the managers NEW PRIORITY OF THE COUNCIL (Not a vote yet): There seems to be the overwhelming consensus that we need a clear, standardised rulebook; such was promised in almost every election campaign. I will try and set up a project for it, so please reply here with your suggestions for what rules to be implemented in this hypothetical rulebook. Since the support is pretty much unanimous, we won’t need to put this up to a manager vote, and we can instead focus solely on the actual creation of the policies. All manager discussions & voting will be held at this studio: https://scratch.mit.edu/studios/37079835 Each manager is able to put forward a policy, which will be voted on by the council. Most proposals will pass or be rejected through a simple majority (6/10 votes), though this may change depending on the circumstances. I do not hold the full power of a host in this council, though I reserve the power to veto some decisions.
(Notably, Only managers can vote.) Legal Reasons provided by @Cosmonaut218: Appears to be nearly active all day anytime whenever it comes to such activities available, She appears to be exceptionally more active. Appears fairly good at roleplay & combines within above & the ability to check for powerplay & solve issues. Be general to be good at solving problems, incase of a major dispute between players, just like how she did problem solvings at school. Ability to drop her opinions on a topic if needed & become a true party. ===[More Slots]=== @alphaIXX - Abstain
