Read all. So, The proof. On the right is the process from the og project. Left is the proof project. COMPARISON 1. Here are the sketches for the same art piece. How is one sketch done perfectly while the other looks like a messy sketch? 2. The lineart. One has already done lineart. The other has half-rendered colors with lineart fading in and out. (And it’s using a different sketch??) 3. Color. One has patchy, opaque color. The other has wispy translucent color (and the sketch is peeking out the elbow) 4. The final. Looks very different from both examples. So. Who’s lied. You or you? Cuz it’s gotta be one of them with these wildly different processes. PLUS Look at the circles i’ve added. Red: goes against proof Blue: just doesn’t make sense in general (I made a mistake and switched them up for the lineart slide) SKETCH On the sketch, the red circles show spots that are magically done. Almost appearing as lineart. There’s no base or guide for anatomy, it’s just done. The blue shows random lines that appear to do nothing but just exist. No purpose other than just filling space. LINEART On the lineart the blue shows inconsistencies. Percy’s eyebrows are filled in dark, while Annabeth’s have strokes. The drawstring also looks strange as if someone had just gone over an og drawing. The red shows dark spots. The lineart would obviously go on top considering the patchy color, yet those black areas would block any color. It appears more like a black-white comic than lineart. COLOR The red on the color shows spots where an eraser has gone on and gotten rid of some color. This makes no sense considering that on the final, color appears in those spots. It’s also very patchy and pixelated, represented by blue. Way different from the color and rendering on the final. On the small blue circle on Annabeth’s arm, and in Percy’s hair, blue/green pixels are shown. They are done in the same artstyle, so it wasn’t just a camera glitch. In the final these blue/green appear to be highlights, not part of the normal coloring. FINAL The final is done with smooth, even coloring, with slightly messy-but-confident lineart, and translucent highlights. It looks nothing like either process shown. It was also found posted on Pin with multiple people claiming to have seen it posted on the internet ~2 years ago. You have two wildly different processes that both would not yield the final result shown. Sorry, but I’m calling a fake again (especially because your new process looks almost exactly like an ai generated art process, but that might just be me)
CELESTIALFLARE READ THE BOTTOM OF THIS!! My take on CF’s proof (Btw at 9-10, the blue circles show strange curves in the blank space that suggests eraser was used to erase pre-existing color) But genuinely, I hope you’ll be okay. It’s okay to make a mistake once in a while, but what’s important is learning from it. Stay safe and stay creative!
