rant: hey guys. as you know, there are ai "artists" around here. tbh, this- its just.. it infuriates me. those "artists" wont understand the true meaning of actual art. like what the thistledowns? artists spend from minutes to DAYS completing a true masterpiece just for someone to steal it to make ai art. honestly like what? i feel bad for those who had to quit scratch or move anonomously just because someone was stealing their art to spoon feed it to ai. genuinely, people pour their hearts into artworks and possibly getting a sore wrist afterwards meanwhile some random dude here just wrote a prompt, stuck an image, and then clicked the button. WHAT IN THE WHOLE MEANING OF SCRATCH IS THIS??? i would rather write a whole essay stating my point and use proper quotes for "ai "artists" as many times as anyone wants me too " than just generate "art". whats even worse is that they can be mean. especially when the user stated that they "spoke in a neutral and logical respectful manner". dude. we. have. evidence. no need for you to have an excuse to say that you spoke "nicely". genuinely... im mentally tired of this. i am very uncomfortable with ai ruining the joy and spirit of genuine art. people with "bad" art are better than ai. there aint such thing as bad art. #art #stopaiart #stopai
real quotes from some arguments i had: blurred As an artist, I don’t really like seeing ai ‘art’ around. I was going to say at least you didn’t claim it as your own, but then I scrolled down in the comments and saw how rude you’re being to people, and decided you don’t deserve even that. Please keep your rude thought to yourself; no one wants to hear it. You have no right to be rude to these people. ai "artist" @ blurred i communicate in a completely neutral, logical, and respectful manner. if you don't like my work, simply leave my profile and mind your own business, i don't need your respect or approval to understand my rights -Sagenose- @ ai "artist" anonymous for privacy is right. if you have something unpleasant to say keep it to yourself. saying that you are speaking in a respectful manner doesnt mean anything when we see the things you actually say to others ai "artist" I will not stay silent on my profile or ignore the facts. my position has long been clearly stated, and none of your subjective assessments make my words anything other than what they are blurred @ ai "artist" There is nothing 'subjective' about replacing a person’s real, hand-drawn art with machine-generated junk. You didn't improve their work, you completely erased it just to stroke your own ego over an image you didn't even draw. Acting like you're a genius artist because you know how to copy-paste from ChatGPT is completely pathetic ai "artist" @ blurred you literally gathered all the false arguments.1. the word improved is subjective. just because you subjectively dislike AI doesn't make a project slop or bad. 2. i never claimed to be a genius anywhere, i was simply proving my position, which i successfully did:i proved the lack of disrespect and pointed out the right to remix.3. i write all of my replies myself,but you drag ai into this just to avoid actually addressing my points (which btw is classic genetic fallacy) blurred @ ai "artist" Then why the heck did u love others’ art if u are literally supporting and shipping yourself with ai thats all i have
