Theory number zero: Saffronpaw will become evil. Saffronpaw has been said to be uncaring, cunning, and smort. He is communicating with his dead granma who is in the dork Farest!!1!1!! And he is a brown tabby with yellow e yes. Do yoa kno who is also that? Bramblestore!!! Yes there is not doubt that Saffronpaw in the relatove of Bramblesaur!!! They have 2 much in commun to be a codinceidene. Bramblesore is a very evil bad cat who is not gud famly member and same is Saffronpaw nuff said. Theory numer 2: Tansypaw, Perfectpaw and Moonpaw are knockoff starter pokemon. Professor forestFace sells storters fur 8 bucks on amazon. Theory # fhree: Its all a dearm. This story inst real and is instead all a dream of a strange pompon with a face at end of story will wkae up and see that she was ASLEEP ENTIRE TIME. Theory Number Five: Perfectheart is a lie Trey numbers 6: Dave is not the mama. Have you looked at dave closly? See anything? HE NOT GURL. Only gurl can be mom don’t be stoopid idot. 7: All Perfectheart’s dream. nothing was ever real and Perfectpaw is a lonely child who dreamed of freedom in imaginary world wishing he had actually freinds instead of an anime body pillow and 5 different copies of mario cart wii and his pet cat dave. FOUR: .~~~~ .. ... .~. . .~ .~.. Theory Number 8: tANSYPAW rIuNs EVERYtHING In one FELL SWOOP Number Nien: Brownpaw is the writer of Toph and knows a lot more that he thinks? His brother and sister have powers... why doesn’t he? Theory 10: ToPH is a Magnetic Octopus
Okay. At first glance, this appears to be a load of silly, spoofy nonsense. BUT IS IT???? Look at #4. It’s Morse Code. It says: ONEISREAL. One is real. Does that mean the number one is real? I don’t think so, as there is no number one. So it doesn’t mean 1 is real, it means ONE is real. Or, one of the theories is real. BUT WHICH ONE??? The ones I think AREN’T real are: - Zero. For one, Bramblestar isn’t evil and neither is Saffronpaw. They are both just cats who made mistakes and are misunderstood. And Laurelwing isn’t evil either, even though she’s in the DF. SHE made a mistake too, and feels bad about it now. For another, Bramble and Saffron aren’t the same shade of brown, and Bramble has AMBER eyes. Not yellow eyes. Also, Bramble is in ThunderClan and Saffron is in WindClan. Unless all of Saffron’s family are half-Clan, it’s very unlikely they’d be related. Another thing: So far in ToPH, it’s all been completely separate to the canon series! Why introduce canon stuff now? And, if this was true, why would Ranboo be so certain and convincing about it? She loves red herrings, and why make it so obvious that this might be true unless it was a red herring? - 2. This is another silly spoofy nonsense thing. It’s very funny though XD - 7. This is also silly, spoofy, hilarious nonsense. Lol - 10. SPOOFY NONSENSE ALERT. XDDDDDD I wish it was true though XDDDDDD - 6. This is true, but I don’t think it’s THE ONE because it’s so obvious. Ones I think could be real are: - 3. Although it’s written in a very spoofy-seeming way, and it being a dream at the end is CHEATING, Ranboo loves plot twists. So. Maybe. But I don’t have much evidence for this. - 8. Tansypaw ruins everything in one fell swoop. Look. There’s a code here! Read the lower-case letters. It says: trustnone Trust none! This means it’s very likely it’s true - after all, ONEISREAL was in code. Also, if you look at Tansy’s theme song The Wolf, it shows “Tansysong…?” with a question mark. This COULD mean she’s possessed. For more info on this theory, look at ’s “Tansysong gets a corruption arc” theory. So, this COULD be true! I think this is the most likely one considering what Meadowfoot says, and Bramble-and-Saffron is least likely. - 9. COULD Brownpaw be the writer of ToPH? (In the ToPH world obvs - we all know Ranboo’s the real writer.) After all, he does do all that Brownpaw RP stuff. Maybe making things come true via RP could be his power! Maybe… maybe… but probably not. But maybe. Ones I’m not sure about: - 5. This could be interpreted in 2 ways. One way of interpreting is obviously wrong, and the other way could be right. The wrong way of interpreting is: the actual cat Perfectheart is a lie. We all know the actual character is not a lie, because basically the entire SERIES is based around him!!! The maybe right way of interpreting is: Perfectheart’s name is a lie. Because he does not have a perfect heart, so it’s a lie. But then, on the other paw, the whole point of the story is Perfectheart’s learning how not to be a jerk, so it’s probably a wrong theory. OR OR OR!!!! I’ve just realised something! In the completely plan of ToPH, it says “Perfect-?” Lots of people have interpreted this to mean he fails his assessment. BUT WHAT IF IT MEANS HIS NAME IS NOT ACTUALLY GOING TO BE PERFECTHEART, IT’S GOING TO BE SOMETHING ELSE, AND RANBOO HAS BEEN LAUGHING AT US THE WHOLE TIME????? I certainly wouldn’t put it past her. Anyway, that’s all for now! Saki out!
