Using studios for roleplays is gonna major-league suck now. I have run very successful roleplays before, and some of these new changes are gonna make it so hard. Now, if the things like owners only edit and 25-comment-per-strand limit were optional, that'd be awesome! It would help a lot for some studios. But what if I have character storage I have to regularly update, and the flow of new characters is too overwhelming for me to handle alone? Then, all managers being able to edit it, or even just a select few being able to, would really help! And what if I was on vacation and couldn't change anything but one of my trusted and honest friends, who was a manager in that particular studio, knew I was on vacation and saw a really big flaw in the rules or something that they knew I didn't mean for there to be, and knew what I meant? Why should they have to wait until I come back? Managers are meant to be trusted co-owners! AND WHAT I HAD BEEN PERMA-BANNED AND THEN NO-ONE COULD CONTINUE ON WITH THE ROLEPLAY, EVEN IF IT WASN'T THE CAUSE OF THE BAN?! And the 25-comment-per-strand, that's going to cause an overflow of comment strands in roleplays, making it really hard to find new RP comments or if someone was trying to report an error or post a new character! That's going to WRECK roleplaying SO MUCH!!! It might even make people find other places to show stuff, possibly places much more dangerous and less child-friendly! I say, make these changes optional so that it can be turned on and off to help keep children off of the wrong websites more. In some places, these updates are great, but a lot of people, when they log onto scratch, they hope to see invites to roleplays and roleplay replies. These changes will make it harder to find -and manage- good roleplays. This is just my opinion, but I'm willing to bet that I'm not the only one who thinks this. I'm making these suggestions not just for me, but for everyone who comes on to scratch and checks their RPs automatically. It's your loss, ST. -RUEWHO
